<excerpt>A follow up to our previous report:
</excerpt>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/article/130406/birmingham_post_defends_ivf_competition
<excerpt><color><param>6666,6666,6666</param><smaller>
</smaller></color></excerpt>from The Press Gazette (UK)
<excerpt><bold><smaller>
</smaller></bold></excerpt>"The Birmingham Post has said its
controversial IVF treatments competition was "never about getting more
readers", following the birth of twins to a winning couple."
The newspaper claims that it was hilighting the inequity of the
"lottery" of NHS infertility funding (depending on where people live)
- however critics claim that it was promoted as a 'win a baby'
competition.
One wonders if the newspaper would have reported unsuccessful cycles -
which are more likely to occur.
